̥

What Makes Hippocampal Segmentation
Difficult and How AI Can Do It Better

10 October, 2025

Introduction

Segmenting the hippocampus on brain MRI slices is a time-consuming task. Radiologists often zoom in, adjust the contrast, and carefully try to determine where the hippocampus ends and the amygdala begins. The borders are frequently blurry, the shapes complex, and by the time the process is complete, as much as half an hour may have passed. If another colleague repeats the task, the results can look different from the first attempt.

For a structure as important as the hippocampus, even small differences matter. Its importance has been outlined in our previous blog, while this article focuses on the challenge of measuring it accurately.

Why Segmentation Is So Difficult

When radiologists examine the hippocampus on MRI scans, several challenges make segmentation difficult:

A Small, Complex Structure

The hippocampus is tiny compared to the rest of the brain. Its seahorse-like curves and layered subfields make it anything but simple to outline. Even a few pixels’ difference can significantly alter the volume measurement.

Blurred Boundaries

Unlike bones or ventricles, the hippocampus lacks sharp edges. It blends into nearby structures such as the amygdala, parahippocampal gyrus, and temporal horn, forcing radiologists to make judgment calls on each slice.

MRI Variability

No two scans are identical. Orientation, patient motion, and contrast settings all affect how the hippocampus appears, making manual standardisation nearly impossible.

Human Error and Fatigue

Long reporting days take a toll. A minor slip of the mouse or a slightly different interpretation of a boundary is all it takes to introduce variability and across multiple cases, these differences add up.

Inconsistency Across Readers

Even two experienced neuroradiologists may produce slightly different outlines. This inter-rater variability is a recognized limitation and creates real challenges in clinical trials or longitudinal studies, where reliability is critical.

Complex Cases Increase Difficulty

Pathological changes such as atrophy, lesions, surgical alterations, or motion artifacts make hippocampal borders even harder to define. Ironically, these are the very patients where precise measurements are most needed - yet they are also the least reliable to obtain manually.

How AI Is Changing the Workflow

Instead of spending half an hour tracing the hippocampus manually, radiologists can now upload an MRI Scan file and, within minutes, receive:

  • A clean segmentation overlay of the hippocampus
  • A volumetric report standardized against norms
  • Quality control flags when something looks unusual

No fatigue, no subjective variability, and no waiting. This is what AI-powered segmentation tools are bringing into clinical workflows. Trained on various number of scans, these algorithms can recognize hippocampal borders with a consistency that matches expert tracings, without the limitations of time or exhaustion.

Here’s how AI is reshaping segmentation:

Speed

Segmentation is completed in minutes rather than half an hour, removing a major bottleneck in volumetry.

Consistency

Every scan, every patient, every time — the same rules are applied, eliminating inter-rater variability.

Reliability Across Scanners

Because the models are trained on diverse datasets, they adapt more effectively to differences in field strength, orientation, and protocols.

Transparency

Modern platforms don’t produce a black-box result. They provide overlays and quality control checks, allowing radiologists to verify accuracy before signing off.

Scalability

Whether it’s 20 patients a week or 2,000 across multiple sites, automated tools scale effortlessly, making hippocampal volumetry practical for both research and routine clinical practice.

Longitudinal monitoring

This also includes the comparisons of a patient’s scans over time.

From Burden to Support

Instead of spending valuable time drawing boundaries, radiologists can focus on what truly matters:

  • Interpreting whether a volume change is clinically significant
  • Communicating results clearly to the treating team
  • Integrating imaging findings into the patient’s overall clinical picture

AI does not replace the radiologist, but it supports them. Handling the repetitive work of segmentation allows experts to apply their skills where they have the greatest impact.

Beyond the Hippocampus

The hippocampus is only the beginning. The same methods can be extended to:

  • Other regions:such as the amygdala, thalamus, and cortical lobes
  • Whole-brain volumetry:enabling the tracking of global atrophy patterns
  • Longitudinal monitoring:allowing comparisons of a patient’s scans over time
  • Multimodal integration:combining imaging results with laboratory and clinical data for deeper insights

This reflects the future of radiology a shift from purely qualitative reporting toward a combination of visual expertise and quantitative precision.

Conclusion

Manual hippocampal segmentation will always have value in carefully controlled research, but it might not scale in routine clinical practice. The process is slow, variable, and dependent on human judgment

AI is changing that reality. Automating segmentation reduces workload, improves reproducibility, and makes quantitative imaging practical. This allows radiologists to spend less time tracing borders and more time delivering the clinical insights that matter most for patient care.

Call to Action

Ready to Transform Your Workflow?

At Alzevita, we’re building tools to make hippocampal and brain segmentation fast, consistent, and clinically meaningful. Contact us to learn more or request early access.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Manual segmentation requires tracing the hippocampus slice by slice across multiple planes. Each scan can take 20–30 minutes, and even longer if the MRI quality is variable. For a busy radiology department or a large clinical trial, this becomes impractical.

The main risks are human error and inconsistency. Fatigue, subtle anatomical boundaries, and differences in interpretation between experts lead to variability in results. This variability can affect diagnosis, longitudinal monitoring, or cross-site studies.

AI models are trained on diverse, multi-center datasets that include scans from different field strengths, vendors, and protocols. This broad training improves generalizability and ensures consistent results across hospitals and imaging labs.

No. AI is a support tool, not a replacement. Automated segmentation reduces repetitive, manual work, but radiologists remain central in verifying outputs, interpreting results, and communicating findings in the clinical context. AI augments expertise; it doesn’t replace it.

Alzevita focuses on combining clinical importance, technical feasibility, and strategic focus. Starting with the hippocampus allows us to provide high-quality, validated results that solve a real-world radiology pain point. Our platform is cloud-based, user-friendly, and built for routine workflows, with outputs available as overlays and structured volumetric reports. (Alzevita Website)

Our current users include radiologists, neurologists, researchers, and diagnostic labs who need fast, standardized hippocampal measurements. Whether in clinical care or multi-center research, the tool provides efficiency, reproducibility, and scalable insights.

References